Ezine 69 Excellere

Maison Juillet
Ezine Excellere 69
JUNE 2009.

CONTENTS:

Cleopatra's nose.............By Bob Davenport.
The world of Doctor DR. SHRINIWAS KASHALIKAR........... By Creacionista Charles.
CORRUPT THINKING ............By Magoma
North Korea way of thinking...................By Darth Vader.
Hitler again......................By Jurgen Reitze
A word about old politics.................by Mr. Farthon Climbor.
Triangle UFO Witness Fears Alien Abduction ......................By Farthom Climbor.
Nibiru, the planet X................By Nick Obre.

**********************************************************************************************

CLEOPATRA'S NOSE...............BY BOD DAVENPORT.

Pascal's remark in the Pensées : "Cleopatra's nose: if it had been shorter, everything in the world would have changed." The intent was not to dismiss biography as a way into the structuring of a historical narrative, but to reject the idea that the properties, ideas, or actions of some particular person were the necessary conditions for the unfolding of events in the world. If Josef Djugashvili had never been born, someone else could have been Stalin.

Despite this injunction, a remarkable amount of the history of science has been written through the medium of biographies of "great" scientists to whose brilliant discoveries we owe our understanding of the material world, and this historical methodology has reinforced the common notion that history is made by outstanding individuals. No respectable historian would claim that if Newton had never been born we would still be ignorant about gravitation. Yet we still refer to the regularities of the behavior of physical bodies as "Newton's Laws," the general regularities of simple inheritance as "Mendelism," and the science of biological evolution as "Darwinism." Even the famous history of science written by the Marxist J.D. Bernal is a recounting of the discoveries and inventions of individuals.

It would be wrong to say that biography is the sole, or even principal, present pathway into an understanding of the history of science. Certainly since Robert Merton's founding of modern studies of the sociology of science in his 1938 work on seventeenth-century English science,[2] the social milieu in which the problems of science arise and the institutional structure of scientific investigation have been central to our understanding of the history of scientific work. There are, however, occasions on which there are orgies of idolatrous celebrations of the lives of famous men, when the Suetonian ideal of history as biography overwhelms us. For Darwinians, 2009 is such a year.

It is the two hundredth anniversary of Darwin's birth, and because, whether by chance or design, Darwin published his famous work when he was fifty, it is the 150th anniversary of the appearance of On the Origin of Species, It is not clear at what intervals such commemorations might occur. I myself have been a participant in international symposia on the one hundredth anniversary of the appearance of the Origin in 1859 and the one hundredth anniversary of Darwin's death in 1882, both of which were attended by leading scientists of the time and resulted in commemorative volumes.

Neither of those occasions, however, was marked by the immense outpouring of Darwinalia that has marked the current occasion. On my desk are fifteen works that have just appeared, of which eleven are biographical, including two selections of Darwin's letters, two books about the Origin, and two books concerned with explicating and commenting on evolutionary biology and its implications; but none deals either with the history of evolutionary thought before Darwin, or in any detail with his contemporary, Alfred Russel Wallace, the acknowledged independent inventor of the theory of evolution by natural selection, or the socioeconomic milieu in which Darwin and Wallace worked. Beyond these publications there are plans for two dozen commemorative gatherings of scientists, historians, and philosophers, so many indeed that some had to be put off until next year so that busy evolutionists could fit them into their schedules.

Of the books that have appeared this year that are directly related to the history of nineteenth-century evolutionary theory, two are clearly worth attention. One is Janet Browne's Darwin's Origin of Species, which is an excellent short excursion through the origin of Darwin's book, its argument, its publication, and the controversies it engendered. It ends with an all-too-brief summary of the history of modern evolutionary genetics and the attempts to demonstrate natural selection in action in nature, as well as a quick visit to modern creationism.

These subjects deserve a treatment in extenso while some of the participants or their immediate students are still among the living, perhaps by a collaboration of a sophisticated and knowledgeable historian like Browne with someone in the thick of it. The other work of interest to the reader of the Origin is an annotated text of the first edition, juxtaposing a facsimile of Darwin's publication with an extensive page-by-page commentary by James Costa. Costa makes use of his experience as a field naturalist and his knowledge of the modern literature of evolutionary biology to illumine many passages in Darwin's work.

Why do we call the modern theory of organic evolution "Darwinism"? Charles Darwin certainly did not invent the idea of evolution, that is, of the continuous change in time of the state of some system as a fundamental property of that system, or even the idea that a process of evolution had occurred in the history of life. The study of the evolution of the cosmos itself was founded in Kant's Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science in 1786 and Laplace's nebular hypothesis of 1796. Sadi Carnot's second law of thermodynamics, the principle that over time all differences in energy between bits and pieces of the universe decrease, was published in 1824. The idea that the various geological formations observed on earth were not the result of a unique catastrophe or Great Flood, but the consequence of repeated and continual geological processes still going on at present, was postulated before the turn of the nineteenth century by James Hutton and long since accepted by 1859.

By the time of the appearance of the Origin, the physical sciences had become thoroughly evolutionary. Living beings were not seen as an exception. In 1769, Diderot had his dreaming philosopher d'Alembert wonder what races of animals had preceded us and what sorts would follow. He provided the motto of evolutionism as a worldview: "Everything changes, everything passes. Only the totality remains." Darwin's grandfather, Erasmus, in his epic The Temple of Nature of 1803, invokes his Muse to tell "how rose from elemental strife/Organic forms, and kindled into life," and the Muse completes the evolutionary story by telling him that even "imperious man, who rules the bestial crowd,/...Arose from rudiments of form and sense." By the younger Darwin's time, the idea of organic evolution had become a common currency of intellectual life. Two years before the publication of the Origin, Herbert Spencer argued for a belief in organic evolution on the basis of the agreed-upon universality of evolutionary processes:

It is now universally admitted by philologists that languages, instead of being artificially or supernaturally formed, have been developed. And the histories of religion, of philosophy, of science, of the fine arts, of the industrial arts, show that these have passed through stages.... If, then, the recognition of evolution as the law of many diverse orders of phenomena has been spreading, may we not say that...evolution will presently be recognized as the law of the phenomena we are considering?
If Darwin (and Wallace) did not invent the idea of evolution or its application to the history of life, then at least it might be claimed that they invented a natural historical theory of the cause of that evolution. But they were not the first to do so. Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, in a succession of works between 1801 and 1809, provided a biological theory of adaptive organic evolution based on the supposed inheritance of changes acquired by organisms in the course of their individual lives. The example often cited is the roughly six-foot increase in the length of giraffes' necks from their ancient origin as deer-like animals. If giraffes in any generation stretched their necks, even slightly, to feed on leaves higher up in trees, and if that slight increase in length were passed down to their offspring, then over many generations the cumulative effect would be the extraordinary shape of the modern giraffe.

Lest the sophisticated readers of TheNew York Review of Books regard this as a hopelessly outmoded nineteenth-century view of biology, it should be pointed out that until about fifteen years ago a neo-Lamarckian institution affiliated with the University of Paris, the Laboratoire d'Évolution des Êtres Organisés, carried out scholarly research on evolution that took seriously the possibility of the inheritance of acquired characteristics.


Individuals in a population differ from each other in the form of particular characteristics (the principle of variation).
Offspring resemble their parents more than they resemble unrelated individuals (the principle of heritability).
The resources necessary for life and reproduction are limited. Individuals with different characteristics differ in their ability to acquire those resources and thus to survive and leave offspring in the next generations (the principle of natural selection).
It seems amazing that two naturalists could independently arrive at the same articulated theory of evolution from a consideration of the characteristics of some species of organisms in nature, their geographic distribution, and their similarities to other species. This amazement becomes considerably tempered, however, when one considers the social consciousness and economic milieu in which the theory arose, a milieu marked by the rise of competitive industrial capitalism in which individuals rose in the social hierarchy based, presumably, on their greater entrepreneurial fitness.

Darwin's maternal grandfather, Josiah Wedgwood, started life as a potter's apprentice and rose to be a member of the circle of new Mid- land industrial magnates along with James Watt, James Keir, and Matthew Boulton. While the nineteenth-century theory that some rose and some fell in society depending on their personal strengths and weaknesses is often referred to as "social Darwinism," we would be much more in agreement with historical causation were we to call Darwinism "Biological Competitive Capitalism." The perceived structure of the competitive economy provided the metaphors on which evolutionary theory was built.

One can hardly imagine anything that would have better justified the established social and economic theories of the Industrial Revolution than the claim that our very biological natures are examples of basic laws of political economy. How else are we to explain the immediate and continued commercial success of Darwin's books? The entire first edition of 1,250 copies of the Origin was immediately snapped up by booksellers. The expectation of public interest is revealed by the fact that a circulating library took five hundred copies.[3] The sixth edition, only thirteen years later, sold 11,000 copies. One cannot understand the origin and the immediate success of the Origin outside of the social and economic setting in which it was conceived, nor have historians of science ignored the question. The pages of the Journal of the History of Biology have certainly not been devoid of papers on the subject. Yet what we have been provided with in 2009 is biography and annotations on the Origin, Perhaps it is time for a socioeconomic analysis of our own preoccupations.

The parallel between the arguments for natural selection and nineteenth-century economic and social theory, however, misses an extremely important divergence between Darwin and political economy. The theory of competitive socioeconomic success is a theory about the rise of individuals and individual enterprises as a consequence of their superior fitness. But even though the Industrial Revolution resulted eventually, at least in some countries, in a general rise in material well-being, the number of immensely successful entrepreneurs is evidently limited precisely because their success depends on the existence of a large mass of less successful workers. No population can consist largely of people like Henry Clay Frick.

The theory of evolution by natural selection, in contrast, is meant to explain the adaptation and biological success of an entire species as a consequence of the disappearance of the less fit. Provided that a species does not become so numerous as to destroy the resources on which it depends, there is no structural reason why every individual of that species cannot be highly fit. If we seek a true originality in the understanding of Darwin and Wallace, it is to be found in their ability to adapt a theory meant to explain the success of a few to produce a theory of the success of the many, even though the many may be competing for resources in short supply. Whether they were conscious of this divergence of the theory of evolution by natural selection from the reigning economic and social theory is a question.

Despite the intuitive appeal of the theory of evolution by natural selection, there is a deep flaw in it as it was conceived in the nineteenth century, a flaw that was potentially fatal: it lacked an understanding of heredity. This problem was first pointed out in 1867 by a Scottish engineer, Fleeming Jenkin, but it does not seem to have had any effective force. From the observations that Darwin (and breeders) made about domesticated animals and plants, the most likely basis for the inheritance of characteristics seemed some sort of mixture of an internal fluid. If, for example, a large-bodied variety was mated to a small-bodied one, the usual outcome was offspring of intermediate size.

The problem is that if inheritance proceeds by a blending mechanism, then new variants in a species would rapidly be lost by dilution through mating with the common form. Suppose a variant individual appeared that was larger than normal. That individual would necessarily mate with the normal type and their offspring would be intermediate. When those few intermediate offspring mated it would almost certainly be with the vastly more numerous normal form so that the next generation of this family would be yet closer to the usual type. After a few generations of this process of dilution by crossing, there would be no detectable variation on which natural selection could operate, even if a larger type would be of some selective advantage. The reduction of variation by half with each generation is a vastly more powerful force than any biologically reasonable countervailing difference in reproductive fitness.

The Darwinian mechanism would, in fact, not work in a world of blending inheritance. Unknown to Darwin, Wallace, or any of the enthusiasts for the claim of evolution by natural selection, work by an obscure monk in the Königenkloster at Brno in Moravia would turn out to save the theory. Mendel's experiments on peas demonstrated that inheritance was not based on the blending of some fluid-like material, but by the passage of particles that maintained their individual properties even when mixed together in a hybrid. Thus, in future generations, variant properties would reappear even though what we now call the genes for those variants were temporarily mixed with the normal gene forms in hybrids.

The journal of the Brünn Society of Natural Science in which Mendel's research was published would never have been read by the English scientific establishment, nor indeed by anyone in the major centers of nineteenth-century natural science. It was not until 1900 that Mendel's work was rediscovered as a consequence of the appearance of new scientific results on crossing plants. In full historical justice, if we are to personalize our modern explanation of evolution we should call it not "Darwinism," nor even "Darwin-Wallacism," but "Darwin-Wallace-Mendelism."

The present understanding of natural selection of chance variants—variants produced through mutations of genes—as the basis for adaptive evolution obscures the historical fact that in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries evolution was accepted as a reality but other scientific explanations for it existed and came into competition with "Darwinism." Lamarck's theory of the inheritance of acquired characteristics was certainly coherent given the ignorance of the basis of heredity, and was, in a sense, more nearly complete than Darwin's precisely because it included and depended on a definite theory of inheritance. A direct challenge to Darwin appeared in 1860 in an article in the prestigious journal Edinburgh Review, Although unsigned, it is generally accepted that its author was Richard Owen, a zoologist of considerable fame and prestige whose Hunterian Lectures on zoology were attended by Queen Victoria and Darwin himself. Exhibiting a typical hardworking professional's disdain for the amateur, Owen writes that Darwin

has long been favourably known...by the charming style [of his] observations.... Of independent means, he has full command of his time for the prosecution of original research.... The same pleasing style which marked Mr. Darwin's earliest work, and a certain artistic disposition...
have had the result that "several, and perhaps the majority, of our younger naturalists have been seduced into the acceptance" of his theory.

Owen's personal attack aside, he points out, quite correctly, that neither Darwin nor anyone else knows what the underlying phenomena of heredity and development really are and that the transformation and divergence of organisms over time might simply be the manifestation of some hidden laws of development. Moreover, similar species that Darwin would claim as having evolved from a common ancestor might simply be developmental variants produced in response to different environments. I must confess that in reading Owen's essay I found myself over and over nodding my head in agreement. Given the state of ignorance of basic biological processes in 1860, Owen might well have been right.

How are we to explain the extraordinary activity surrounding the 150th anniversary of the appearance of On the Origin of Species ? It seems unlikely that an enthusiasm of equal magnitude will greet the 150th anniversary, seven years from now, of Mendel's paper, if we can judge by the moderate celebrations of its one hundredth in 1966. Yet genetics in its present molecular stage pervades the public consciousness as more and more genes are discovered that may be relevant to health and longevity.

The primary reason for the attention being paid to Darwin is the rejuvenation in recent years of theories of the divine creation of the earth and the organisms that inhabit it. In the years following the end of World War II, natural science became a major preoccupation of the state and of education. The sounds of the explosions over Hiroshima and Nagasaki were heard in every American classroom and a dozen years later Sputnik had hardly made its first orbit before Congress was pouring money into the institutions of American science, both universities and government agencies like the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health. One immediate consequence was the creation by the NSF of the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study in 1958, which brought together university and high school teachers to rewrite the biology curriculum for the schools.

The result was a major change in the teaching of biology, with a large emphasis on evolution both in textbooks and in the classroom. Although we may think that the Scopes trial legitimized the teaching of evolution, it had little effect on public education. When I was a high school student in the late 1940s, evolution was not part of the standard science curriculum even in the New York public high schools, although teachers were at liberty to introduce it. Sputnik changed all that.

There remains, nevertheless, a substantial population whose commitment to a fundamentalist Christian belief in divine creation of the earth and its inhabitants has driven them to political action. Having been convinced that the separation of church and state is here to stay, they have adopted a pseudo-scientific theory of intelligent design in which the designer is unspecified, and attempted to introduce it into the school curricula in the name of intellectual openness. The scientific community has the definite sense of being embattled and one of its responses is to use the two hundredth anniversary of the birth of its apostle of truth about the material basis of evolution and the 150th anniversary of the appearance of his gospel to carry on the struggle against obscurantism. Jerry Coyne's Why Evolution Is True is intended as a weapon in that struggle.

Coyne is an evolutionary biologist who, like his former student H. Allen Orr, has been a leader in our understanding of the genetic changes that occur when species are formed. His primary object in writing this book is to present the incontrovertible evidence that evolution is a physical fact of the history of life on earth. In referring to the theory of evolution he makes it clear that we do not mean the weak sense of "theory," an ingenious tentative mental construct that might or might not be objectively true, but the strong sense of a coherent set of true assertions about physical reality. In this he is entirely successful.

Where he is less successful, as all other commentators have been, is in his insistence that the evidence for natural selection as the driving force of evolution is of the same inferential strength as the evidence that evolution has occurred. So, for example, he gives the game away by writing that when we examine a sequence of changes in the fossil record, we can

determine whether the sequences of changes at least conform to a step-by-step adaptive process. And in every case, we can find at least a feasible Darwinian explanation.
But to say that some example is not falsification of a theory because we can always "find" (invent) a feasible explanation says more about the flexibility of the theory and the ingenuity of its supporters than it says about physical nature. Indeed in his later discussion of theories of behavioral evolution he becomes appropriately skeptical when he writes that

imaginative reconstructions of how things might have evolved are not science; they are stories.
While this is a perfectly good argument against those who claim that there are things that are so complex that evolutionary biology cannot explain them, it allows evolutionary "theory" to fall back into the category of being reasonable but not an incontrovertible material fact.

There is, of course, nothing that Coyne can do about the situation. There are different modes of "knowing," and we "know" that evolution has, in fact, occurred in a stronger sense than we "know" that some sequence of evolutionary change has been the result of natural selection. Despite these misgivings, it is the case that Coyne's book is the best general explication of evolution that I know of and deserves its success as a best seller.

An important property of adaptive evolution is that it is usually a slow process. Certainly there are cases where a single genetic change can mean the difference between life and death in a hostile environment. The classic cases are the mutations that give pathogenic microorganisms the ability to resist antibiotics or mutations that allow crops to resist pathogens, for example insects or herbicides. But these are not representative models for how species adapt, by accumulation of mutations of small effect, to changes in food availability, temperature modifications, and the thousand shocks that flesh is heir to. The usual small differences in fitness among genotypes are therefore manifest as detectable evolutionary change only after thousands of generations.

This deliberate tempo has presented the human species with a problem of adaptation. With a human generation of about twenty-five years, there have been roughly only one hundred generations since the founding of the Roman Republic. Yet the changes in the human environment caused by changes in human activity have been enormous. Changes in diet, habitation, working conditions, the pollution of air and water, and especially the considerable increase of lifespan that result in major alterations and breakdowns in the bodily machinery have all been too rapid for genetic adaptation.

Indeed for environmental changes that have their effect after the age of reproduction, it is not clear that natural selection can operate at all. The constant exposure to high doses of solar radiation that is experienced by surfers on the California beaches might induce an eventually fatal skin cancer, but the cancer death almost always occurs well after reproductive age, so there is no opportunity for selection to act. The general result is that parts of the human genome are out of correspondence with the conditions of modern life.

Greg Gibson, a prominent student of the human genome and of the genetics of development, brings together in It Takes a Genome typical cases of this mismatch between the human physiology that is an inheritance from the past and modern environmental challenges. As a consequence of his past work on genetics and development, Gibson does not fall into the error of that genomania that supposes that every difference between individuals is a consequence of having different genes. He is careful to insist that there be very good evidence for the conclusion that some disease conditions reveal a genetic defect.

Nevertheless he makes a good case that the current state of the human genotype makes us susceptible to physiological and developmental challenges that did not exist for our remote ancestors. The major changes from the usually minimal hunter-gatherer animal and plant diets to high-calorie sugar intakes cause great stress to our carbohydrate metabolism. In a curious contradiction of modern life, while in many human populations, for example in Africa, people are dying young from overwork and undernourishment, people in technologically advanced societies are dying at a greater age from overeating and too little physical activity. We cannot count on natural selection to deal with the problem.

It seems that Cleopatra's is not the only nose in question. In his brief Autobiography Darwin writes of his successful visit to Captain FitzRoy to arrange for his trip on the Beagle :

Afterwards, on becoming very intimate with Fitz-Roy, I heard that I had run a very narrow risk of being rejected on account of the shape of my nose! He was an ardent disciple of Lavater, and was convinced that he could judge of a man's character by the outline of his features; and he doubted that anyone with my nose should possess sufficient energy and determination for the voyage. But I think he was afterwards well satisfied that my nose had spoken falsely.
But what if it had been bigger?

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

The world of Doctor DR. SHRINIWAS KASHALIKAR........... By Creacionista Charles.

It's worth of note how Dr. Shriniwas Kashalikar organizes the world, with his own ideas; of course, we in the west of the world, have little to do with the adoration of images they have in India. They don't take things as we, like going to Mass every sunday morning good bye, so to speak. We didn't "live" the experience except for an hour; we seat and stand up when the priest said so, some four times in that hour, and that's it.
No, in India you camouflage yourself in strange attires; you must put a different color for a different god, and also, not the same dress in the hundred different ocassions you must attend; also, it's not one hour but weeks at the time; so your house perhaps serves to go there to sleep and come back for more.
In ancient times they decorate their god's shrines with guirnalds and flowers, precious stones and the like; now there is that and more, as they insert electric lights and gadgets you cannot imagine, so it's rather crowdy at the shrine, and it's a spellbound experience to everyone to be there.
Plus the chanting, real mantras sing all day and night by the priests and attendants; suddenly they raise ,take a image and out to the street, to sing and walk behind the god in image.


"We never knew Shiva was like that" said Zarathrustra in his rather deep voice.We looked around at Zeus and Mars and Poseidon and Dominion and Armageddon and several other Gods who were listening to the conversation. "What an absolute sweetie pie he is! You know, we have known Shiva for thousands of years, but we never knew he was like that." "Ah did you catch him singing and dancing in the rain with his very English umbrella" said Brahma. "But Gods are meant to be loved" said the Borg "no point being a God if you are not a lovable person and he is not only sweet, his is a powerful God also.""But we have lived here above Greece in Olympus for thousands of years, and we knew Shiva and Brahma were over there in their world above the clouds and we spoke to them now and then but we NEVER knew Shiva was such a darling. You are right. It would be impossible not to love Shiva. But we never knew he was like that. Not until you came." "Do Gods worship Gods then?" asked Brahma while doing an equimax faction problematic diverse platitude math puzzle and drinking from a large glass of beer and writing a symphony."Well, we all seem to worship Shiva at the moment.""Huh, I will get jealous" said Brahma "may send another flood down to Earth as an expression of how many tears I weep that you prefer Shiva.""You cannot do that" said Shiva "remember you sent a rainbow to say you would never do that again.""Huh. And Gods keep promises do they?" said Brahma.

"Shiva does most of the work" said Brahma "but I created the place, not bad for an ordinary world to live in is it and Vishnu makes it real and seem real and the people seem to think it is real.""Not bad" said Zeus"Krisna does the Heavens and Paradises and those kind of places but Earth is not bad for an ordinary place to live in eh?""I don't like beer" said Shiva"Well I like beer" said Brahma "and anyhow darling you can always have some nice fancy cocktails and strawberry flavoured stuff if you like""Are you accusing me of not being a MAN?" said Shiva, standing up and accidentally causing an earthquake and three hurricanes on Earth."Not at all sweetie" said Brahma"Hmm, you are trying to make me lose my temper" said Shiva "well just this time, I won't" "Let us all sing a song" said the Borg."Good idea""Let us sing Our ship is a happy happy ship, a happy happy ship called Heaven""We don't know that one" said Zeus"How about that really cool one you do that we all like" said Brahma "will we won't we will we won't we will we won't we Assimilate you. That one was great fun.""Ok said the Borg" and five super Borg appeared with rock guitars and drums and keyboards and once again off to dreamland the Gods went with some of the Borg singing and dancing with the Borg and happy times again as old friends meet once more in endless space and eternity.


*The Awareness about your own physical existence, passions, feelings, thoughts and perspective constitute individual consciousness. Individual consciousness; separated from the objective consciousness is weak, diffident and insecure. It keeps you away from the fountainhead of power, confidence and assurance! The fear of losing identity, the fear losing individual life, the fear of not being able to do something in life, are hallmarks of growing but isolated individual consciousness. The resentment about prevalence of injustice.


******************************************************************************

CORRUPT THINKING ............By Magoma



*What is this corrupt thinking? The holistic perspective or normal perspective as gets corrupted (diseased and degenerated) gradually becomes increasingly NARROW, sick and sectarian. From this sick and sectarian soil of corrupt perspective, the sick and sectarian; corrupt thinking germinates! Everything holistic gets degenerated into everything sick and sectarian! The racially discriminating constitutions, the legal discrimination on the basis of castes, legal yet unjust tax system/s to exploit certain section for the benefit of another section, the r

*Your perspective is like the space of your consciousness! If the “space” of your consciousness is normal, then your perspective is universal or normal! The degree of restriction of that space of your consciousness determines the degree of the suffocation and throttling of your consciousness and your perspective also! The degree of this suffocation and throttling corrupts your perspective proportionately. Thus as the space of your consciousness goes on getting restricted and your perspective goes getting deteriorated, you start getting separated fr
*The word corruption is used so extensively and in so many contexts that it’s meaning has become obscure! Hence corruption is usually and wrongly equated with mere financial scams, bribing, kick backs etc. Actually the corruption is as ubiquitous as life and the consciousness! The degree of degradation (influenced by the surroundings and influencing the surroundings as well) in one’s own eyes; either consciously or subconsciously and knowingly or unknowingly; determines the degree of corruption (one’s perspective, thoughts, feelings and actions)!
*Just as there is “Blessing is Disguise”, there is also “Curse in Disguise”! If you are a media person then usually you have to go through it! In fact most of the people in businesses bringing quick money and fame; such as advertisement, movies, TV serials, and now a days even sports and politics, have to go through this malady of “Curse in Disguise”! In your business you generally get more money, more fame, more glamour, more popularity, and more power and so on! But! All these personal and transient gains generally bloat your ego beyond a limit.
*Media constitute the eyes of the human society, which is akin to a human being. In Marathi and Sanskrit this is called SAMAJPURUSHA. The media personnel constitute the nerves in these eyes. The health of these nerves and eyes determines what the society sees, how it feels and the way in which it responds! Today; these eyes are exposed to enormous stress and strain due to rapidly changing, complicated and hence confusing and disturbing events in the world! The conscience of the society is the brain of the SAMAJPURUSHA and intends to instruct the ner
*Life is tremendously influenced through print, electronic and various other forms of media; by many individuals and organizations to serve their purpose. Sometimes this influence has been beneficial and sometimes harmful. If the media assume excessive importance in your life, then the media can prejudice you in one way or another. It can stupefy you with illusions of utopian heavens or dread of unrealistic hells! *This is why sometimes the media appear to be the heroes of the spiritual renaissance and other times they appear to be villains of destru
*The spiritualism is usually associated with asceticism. Naturally; those who want to establish themselves as spiritual leaders; tend to show that they have no material needs. Sometimes they are honest but other times they are dishonest cheats! Basically the material needs are physiological. Neither their uncontrolled indulgence (due to mediocre literary trends and/or mercenary hype), nor their forcible suppression (due to fanatic imposition of abstinence, austerity, celibacy etc) are in tune with spiritualism. They are absurd and impart path
*The dynamicity, buoyancy, enthusiasm, restlessness, motivation; and anxiety, tension, worry, fear etc also spring from the combined influence of metabolic, endocrine, autonomic and central nervous activities on brain. The indolence, inertia, indifference, disinterestedness, lowliness, resentment, depression, misery and helplessness also spring from the combined influence of metabolic, endocrine, autonomic and central nervous activities on brain. The elation of success and the depression of failure also result from the combined influence of the
*Stress is universal! With increasing awareness or rather anxiety about of stress (due to inadequate and inappropriate understanding of the concept); the demand for the exotic ways of stress management, stress relaxation and stress relief; has grown exponentially. This has made the marketing of stress management; very easy and profitable! The business of stress management is flourishing! All the Stress Management workshops, lectures, counseling and other exotic stress buster products such as drugs and facilities/amenities such as spas and
We never liked application of oil to head. The stickiness of oil was obnoxious. The stains to clothes also were despicable. The belief that the eyes, face, head, hair, related muscle groups, neck etc are benefited has been prevalent in the people for millennia. But we, who were enamored and overwhelmed with the glamour, glitter, pomp and false glory of the mainstream medical system we were trained in; despised the age old wisdom! But now I have changed. I have admitted my mistake to myself. So, I massage my head almost everyday with plain coconut oil.
The attraction between males and females is eternal and ubiquitous. The experience of this attraction is however peculiar to human beings. Thus there are those who adore nudity and others who condemn it. Hence the art is full of creative work related to sexual attraction and science is full of studies related to sex. The encephalization i.e. development of brain has lead to enormous sex consciousness and human activities such as astrology, divorce, marriage consultants, marriage bureaus, fashion, *advertisement, pornography, blue films, prost
Punishment, deterrent or formative; is judgmental and has element contempt. All punishments do not necessarily legal. SINS Sins are due to incorrect perception, affect and conation; and can be in the form of errors, mistakes, blunders, misdeeds and crimes; being destructive to self or others and make you unconscious of Truth. All sins are not necessarily illegal. Prayashchitta is any action that wakes you up to the realization of Truth. TRUTH Truth is beyond words, but is the bright, buoyant and blissful state of universa
There are many things which make you delighted, generous and provident. These things give you the realization of your nobility and magnanimity. They give you solace and comfort. They rejuvenate you. Why? Is it because of the appearance of these things alone? No. Actually it is the interaction between you and these things; and its association with your past experiences; that makes you feel so nice! It is due to the interplay of your neurohormones, hormones, autonomic nervous system and your central nervous system. *Nudity also can illumine you from wit
Physical intercourse is a biological necessity and enables men and women in propagation of species as well as getting a great deal of fulfillment as individuals. But since human beings are more than individual bodies; much remains to be achieved even at the end of hundreds of successful physical intercourses or masturbations. What is true about physical intercourse is also true about acquiring other sensuous pleasures, through material pursuits. *At the end of every achievement the mind is unsatisfied and restless. This is why people are in sear


************************************

North Korea way of thinking...................By Darth Vader.


The blast is said to have made the ground tremble as far away as the Chinese border.

It seems, then, that reclusive North Korea, with a one million strong army, has dramatically increased its nuclear capability.

And not surprisingly, it has come in for strong international condemnation, with political leaders in Seoul, Tokyo and Washington declaring it an illegal act, a breach of an existing UN resolution.

Even Moscow and Beijing pointed fingers at Pyongyang, with China expressing its "resolute opposition" to the test.

So why has North Korea once again invited pariah status and carried out this nuclear test?

'Final straw'

It had already announced that it was preparing for the test as a response to the international criticism of the rocket launch it carried out last month, although it gave little away about the exact timing.


It is hard to tell what North Koreans really think
It claimed that that rocket, fired from its east coast launch base, was designed to put a communications satellite into orbit, and appeared infuriated by suggestions that it was, in fact, a cover for a long-range missile test.

Condemnation by the UN Security Council, it said, was the final straw.

North Korea's logic ran like this: If the world refused to play fair and recognise its rights, why should the North honour its obligations?

On 14 April, North Korea announced it was quitting the long-running nuclear negotiations, known as Six Party Talks, for good.

But there are many observers, conservatives in Seoul and Washington for example, who have long doubted whether North Korea every really intended to give up its nuclear weapons programme.

And, they have been suggesting, it has simply decided that, for now at least, it may have won all the concessions it can it terms of aid and trade.

Uncertainty over future

North Korea may feel its interests are better served by enhancing its strategic capabilities, possibly to win a bigger payout further down the line.

Some analysts say this nuclear test could be an attempt to shore up the legitimacy of a potentially weakened leader in the eyes of a domestic audience

But there is another consideration.

The North Korean leader, Kim Jong-il, is rumoured to be in poor health and has rarely been seen in public in recent months.

With no clear successor, there is deep uncertainty about the future direction of the country.

Some analysts say that this nuclear test could be an attempt to shore up the legitimacy of a potentially weakened leader in the eyes of a domestic audience.

Of course, it is impossible to know what North Koreans really think.

It is likely that there may be some genuine pride in each announcement it makes concerning its military prowess.

But if there weren't such stringent restrictions on freedom of speech, maybe some North Koreans might wonder aloud about how it is that one of the world's most impoverished regimes has just taken yet another defiant step towards nuclear weapons status.


A novel in which North Korea attacked South Korea with a nuclear bomb, destroying Seul; they invaded and take the region for themselves as Vietnam did in 1970m/m. Then U.S. intervene (must, as it's a military aid of South Korea) and deployed their air force to throw conventional bombs over the North Korea territory; as the Korea government it's a communist one, then China attack the U.S. bombers, and then U.S. attack China (as they must be willing, as it's becoming the future super power, a thing that make U.S. guys without sleep), and to Russia they give ample support in money for his neutrality.
The radiation spreads throughtout the southern hemisphere, killing millions of people and maiming the future of the race in the southern hemisphere, and mildly in the northern one.
That's could be the Third World War. I don't see signs of increased civilizated behaviour in the North Korean regime; instead, I see a bunch of asiatic people crying banshee.



**********************************

Hitler again......................By Jurgen Reitze


Very much aged Adolf Hitler in South America?
Did Barron Adolf Rothschild Hitler flee to Argentina after completing his Zionistic task to construct Israel, then,
AND live till 1980's there, protected by Jewish community?

In 1962, Christopher Story was the only 'goy' working at Jewish banker "S. Japhet & Co." in the City. The Eichmann trial was in the news and Story asked a Jewish co-worker, a "nice middle aged lady," if Adolf Eichmann wasn't himself Jewish?

She replied:" Didn't you know that a Jew's greatest enemy is another Jew?"

Story, 68, now a veteran British journalist, believes that many Nazis who planned and implemented the Holocaust had Jewish blood. Jews who belonged to the (Masonic) Illuminati conspiracy "sided with the Luciferian German Nazis to exterminate millions of their own race in what amounted to an inter-Jewish civil war and ethnic cleansing operation..."

The motivation? Prevent Jews from disappearing as a nation and trick them into becoming Zionists and advancing the New World Order. He cites the famous article in the Jewish owned "Daily Express" headlined "Judea Declares War on Germany" (March 24, 1933). It states that Hitler "has aroused the whole Jewish people to a national consciousness."

Before Hitler came to power, less than 3% of Germany's 500,000 Jews belonged to the Zionist movement.

The account of the Nazi Jews is one of many startling revelations in Story's new book, "The New Underworld Order" which at 740 pages is an encyclopedia of the Illuminati conspiracy, past and present. (The Illuminati is the highest echelon of Freemasonry.)

The author is a devout Christian who has contacts in intelligence services. His new book is a must-read for anyone seriously interested in the NWO. I'm not saying everything is the gospel truth; you'll have to weigh the information yourself. I question some interpretations and details but this is natural in a work of this magnitude.


The extermination of the Indians was the blueprint for the future, as you point out. The Filipinos, the Russians, the Germans, the Chinese, the Vietnamese and Cambodians, the Africans, the Iraqis, etc etc. Millions upon millions of dead following the American extermination program against the Indians, which continues to this day.

I disagree with your description of Hitler as a "perverted little Austrian" who emulated the American genocide program. You should examine our Morgenthau Plan for Germany before throwing stones. Read Other Losses and Crimes & Mercies by James Bacque to see what Hitler was trying to prevent for the German people, mainly because of our starvation program following WWI, in which hundreds of thousands of Germans starved to death before being rescued by Herbert Hoover, Henry Ford and Vidkun Quisling - humanitarians all.

This despite your terming the tame army Indians as "Quislings." Quisling was a highly honorable man and the perversion of his name is typical treatment for those who defy Jewish demands, such as Joe McCarthy. Hitler starved right along with them in the 1920s and gave his food to others who were in danger of dying. You should know that by now. Conservatives and Libertarians and Christians hasten to attack anyone who defies Jewish demands, to show that they can be trusted by the Jews. Kind of like tame army Indians.



The American plan was always to wipe out Germany, or at least to reduce it to its present vassal status. Hitler knew that pretty early. What would you have done in his place? What would you have done in Sitting Bull's place? How exactly would you resist the American steamroller? There is only one way, and the first step is to wipe out the brain of the machine - the Council on Foreign Relations. Hitler should have done that first and the whole annihilation program for Germany would have evaporated. Same with us. Study Samuel Untermayer's declaration of Jewish war against Germany and figure what chance Germany had, even if Hitler had resigned as Untermayer demanded.

At some point in the near future, you and others are going to have to decide if you're on the Jewish side or the anti-Jewish side.


Whatever is related or interpreted about Hitler, or revealed by historical research, he was a very twisted, evil man who was enamored with power, and supremely over-confident in his abilities. You forget that he orchestrated WWII, and the killing of Americans, Poles, Russians, Africans, and other nationals. Those were your vaunted Christians, like myself. There were young men who were drawn by the millions into that conflict, mostly against their will. However, some were possessed of a patriotic fervor, and fought against what they perceived as the ultimate evil. Yes, Stalin (Jewish..), Trotsky (Jewish), and other despots have come and gone in the annals of human slaughter, but Hitler MADE himself the target of the world's population, and his legacy was not undeserved. No nation should vest so much power in an individual or office that it's citizens must blindly obey the occupants of said office. People need to protest. They need to THINK. In America, we must forcefully regain those rights accorded us by the Constitution which have been eroded under the guise of 'Anti-Terrorism", or worse, "Political Correctness". Hitler would have been the type of petty tyrant to enact such laws against dissidents, just as Stalin was, or any other tin-hat demagogue with a penchant for totalitarian rule. To put it succinctly, trust no one in public office until they are relieved of duty, and even then.


I used to hold similar views. And I'm an American cowboy with nothing in common with Europeans. Then I began to study and came to realize that those views had been implanted in me by the usual suspects, since I was a little kid. The big liars had covered up the truth about WWI, Versailles and WWII. Hitler did NOT orchestrate WWII - he did everything possible to avoid it. He and the Germans needed permanent peace to recover from the mind-boggling crimes of Versailles AND the general world depression. The Depression was orchestrated by the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England, the same criminals who devised the Versailles rip-off.

Hitler started the German economic miracle in 1933 and by 1935 Germany was becoming prosperous, with no raw materials or farming or money to buy anything. All Germany had to trade was its high quality workmanship. The Jews led by Untermayer did everything they could to prevent trade by declaring a boycott on German goods in '33 to force Hitler to resign. The German people refused to give him up and by '35 they were taking vacations and eating regularly again, despite the Jews' second starvation program of 1933. America was wallowing in the Depression and would continue right up until Pearl Harbor.

Hitler needed peace but he also needed to nullify the dictatorship of the Versailles "Treaty." That was extremely correct and honorable. He notified the British Ambassador that the ruinous payments would cease immediately, to the outrage of the Jews. Germany had no more orchestrated WWI than they had WWII, but got the blame by the victors who had actually orchestrated both. The Jewish plan was always to destroy Germany and the German people. The Nazis were just a counterforce to this bloodthirsty program, like Hamas, Hezbollah and for that matter, the militia movement in this country a few years ago. In the face of complicity by the US government, the press and academia and industry, there are only so many methods available to protect oneself against Jewish aggression.

Hitler's party had as its number 1 platform position that the German people must be reunited after the maps had been re-drawn by the vacationing drunks at Versailles, dismembering the country and isolating the German people among hostiles. This was deliberate genocide as we understand the term today.

Churchill was hired by the big Jews, represented by Felix Frankfurter and Sir Robert Waley-Cohen, to make a war against Germany. Churchill told General Leonard Wood in '38 or so - "Germany is getting too strong again - we must smash her in another war." Wood testified to Congress about that quote. Churchill's instructions from the Jews were to go to war no matter how reasonable-sounding Hitler may be. Read Churchill's War, Vol I, by Irving. If you're like me, it will give you nightmares. Then read Churchill's Deception by Kilzer. More nightmares.

Hitler's main plan was to destroy Communism in Russia, which had been implanted there by the Wilson administration and by the German army, in combination, after WWI had started. After Wilson's and the Congress' declaration of war against Germany, Wilson collaborated with Germany to plant the Bolsheviks in Moscow to take Russia out of the war and free up German soldiers to fight Americans on the Western Front! Hitler was a highly-decorated soldier in the trenches of the Western Front for four years, while FDR was speculating on Wall Street and Churchill was getting hundreds of thousands of soldiers killed.

The war was not orchestrated by Hitler but by Roosevelt and Churchill, both totally run by the Rothschild money power. They both assured the stupid Poles that if they attacked Germany that the Anglo-Americans would back them up. So the Poles slaughtered thousands of Germans living in "Poland" and Hitler, after repeatedly warning them, had to act to protect the Germans. He'd also asked repeatedly for a corridor to allow travel between Germany and East Prussia, cut off by the Versailles drunks. The Poles said no, feeling very confident that the Anglo-Americans would back them up. They fell for it and got exactly what they deserved for their sadistic treachery.

Hitler had no plans or desire to "rule the world." That was and remains the Jewish program, which they have pretty much achieved on paper. The Jews always accuse their enemies of their own thoughts and crimes. Hitler said often that National Socialism was not for export, that it was an emergency measure to rescue Germany from the Versailles criminals and that it would fade away once Germany was back on her feet. He contemplated retiring from the job until the war was forced on Germany by the Allies.

Stalin had been secretly massing for giant attack against Europe and Hitler only barely beat him to the punch. See Icebreaker by Suverov. That was a brilliant move, wrecked by having to delay the attack by having to rescue the idiot Mussolini's blunders in Greece. The attack was destroyed by the Russian winter, which would have been beaten but for the Greek mistake. Communism would have been destroyed forever but for America's rescue efforts in the form of giving billions of dollars worth of weapons and supplies to Stalin.

Hitler was brilliant in peace but not as brilliant in war. His decisions not to allow the captured Slavs to join the Wehrmacht until it was too late, not to put the Me-262 jet fighter into production until it was too late and the demands to keep fighting at Moscow and Stalingrad, etc, and the decision to send the Jews to Palestine were not so good. But he was far superior to Eisenhower and if it hadn't been for Patton AND the treachery of some German officer-aristocrats, the Ardennes counter-attack would have destroyed the Allied invasion. That was brilliant and of course, German soldiers were far superior to the Dogfaces, the Tommies and the cannon fodder Reds.

The point was that Hitler and the Germans did not want war. They just didn't want to be abused anymore and that's what you get when you're being abused by a combination of greedy, lying murderers such as FDR, Churchill and Stalin and the finance capitalists. The Germans found a guy who would not knuckle under. But Germany, the size of Texas, just couldn't hold out against big Jewish money and armaments and millions of brainwashed gladiators. We all just barely beat them, despite our huge advantages. We will never live down our shame in doing so, on behalf of our Jewish masters.

The really twisted, evil men were FDR, Churchill and Stalin. Hitler was just a very unusual reaction to those monsters. You've really got the whole thing backwards. Approximately a million men from all over Europe joined the SS to fight Communism, even if they weren't pro-Germany. Men such as the Belgian Leon DeGrelle, whom you should study.

You have a particular animus against Hitler despite what you know about Stalin and the other aggressors. But if you take away the Holocaust fraud (that never happened), what is it about Hitler that offends you? Once you admit, after years of study, that there was no program of extermination of Jews or anyone by Germany, what have you got? My opinion is that the world would be better off today if six million Jews had been exterminated, even if there were actually only about three hundred thousand living under German control.

The International Red Cross reportedly has documents indicating a total of about 270,000 people of all kinds dying in the German camps, mostly due to our starvation program. I'm sure the people of Gaza, right this minute, wish that six million Jews hadn't invaded Palestine but had been gassed in Poland sixty years ago. The truth is, though, that no Jew was gassed or otherwise killed in an extermination program, because there was no program. Even the Jews can't come up with a program or a weapon or a dead body caused by an 'extermination program.'

So, Hitler was a dictator. So was Roosevelt, arrogantly staying on for four terms. So was Churchill. If you tried to get rid of FDR or Churchill the way we demanded the Germans to have gotten rid of Hitler (for us), you'd have been shot on sight or executed. FDR rounded up ALL of the totally innocent Japanese-Americans and put them in concentration camps for the duration, and then stole all their property. Churchill was involved in rounding up thousands of Boer women and children in South Africa and putting them in the world's first concentration camps, in which most of them died. Churchill started the deliberate terror-bombing of German civilians. Churchill masterminded the Gallipoli disaster of WWI and the Lusitania disaster and, again in league with his cousin, FDR, the Pearl Harbor disaster.

You need to read James Bacque's two books on the Morgenthau extermination program for Germany, to see who the exterminators were. Study the Morgenthau Plan before you judge Hitler further. Read Germany Must Perish! by Kaufmann, a book recommended by FDR for his D-Day war criminals. Study Operation Keelhaul and the Nuremberg tribunal and start comparing the crimes of Germany, which was acting in self-defense, with the crimes of the Anglo-American-Soviet allies, the aggressors.

I would say that no American or Englishman has the right to judge Hitler or the Germans. Our crimes against humanity are too vast to allow us to judge anyone other than the lying, warmongering Jews who maneuvered us into slaughtering our own people for them.

But Hitler constantly held referendums and was consistently supported by the German people, the Austrian people and others by over 90% approval.

I can't recall one lie ever told by Hitler, compared with Roosevelt's numerous lies ("I say it again and again and again: your sons will not be sent to die in a foreign war...", "A date which will live in INFAMY!", "The Four Freedoms!" "Go ahead, Poland - kill Germans, we'll come to your aid." "We can trust Stalin.") And of course, his statement, "Some of my best friends are Communists."

FDR and Churchill ordered the assassination of anyone who balked or might have revealed the truth about them, just to be safe, and failed numerous times to assassinate Hitler. Hitler forbade assassinations of foreign leaders. Stalin, of course, killed both of his wives and ordered the assassination of millions. So I think your view of Hitler is not justified when you look at all the facts. When you have the combined forces of the Capitalist-Communist world against you and you understand that they intend to exterminate you according to their own literature, you either get very tough or you surrender. Hitler got tough but he didn't get tough enough.
JB Campbell is right on in my book. This is detailed in Icke's book, "...and the truth will set you Free." The Fourth Reich (Empire) is alive and well in American Government, and Hitler surviving the war is more than a wild idea. Ever seen "The Boys From Brazil?"


Yes that's why I started the thread it's not the first time the CIA gave someone a new life for a job well done!
Don't they have some Ex NAZIS in the CIA of-cause this could be just coincidental!
But I say nothing is coincidental!

If most Americans believe that there Government did not pull the 9/11.
How could you expect for them not to believe that Hitler was Burned in a carpet!

But please don't confuse them the Jewish News papers Books & MSM is always right because Jewish people can not do wrong & what reason would they have to lie to there best Friends the America-nos.

IF it shows on MSM or comes from Hollywood or comes out of the mouth of a Politician it must be right.

Lets have one more go & put a woman on the moon!


Hallett's theory also explains why Hitler, supposedly the arch enemy of Jewish bankers, acted like he didn't know the Rothschilds controlled England (and America) when this was practically common knowledge. (See, Hilaire Belloc, "The Jews" 1922). If Hitler were for real, he wouldn't have tried to accommodate these countries. England would have been invaded and conquered before Russia was attacked.

Hallett's hypothesis explains 1)Why Hitler was able to expand into the Rhineland etc. without fear of retaliation. 2) Why the Nazi war machine was financed and built by the Bank of England and a Who's Who of Anglo American corporations controlled by the Illuminati. 3) Why Hitler never sealed the Mediterranean at Gibraltar; and why the Spanish dictator Franco remained neutral, despite the huge debt he owed the Nazis from the Civil War. 4) Why I.G. Farben headquarters in Frankfurt was never bombed. This became CIA headquarters. 5) Why the Bank of England rewarded Hitler for taking Prague by giving him the Czech gold reserves held in London.

It would explain why Hitler gave his ridiculous racial policies priority over actually winning the war. He could have enlisted millions of Slavs (and even many Jews) in overcoming Communist Russia. Instead, he made them implacable enemies willing to fight to the death.

We could question why Japan attacked the U.S. instead of Russia; why the Nazis never figured out that their communications were compromised; why Hitler didn't conquer the oil fields of Russia and the Middle East when he had the chance etc. but you get the picture. The fix was in.

WHO WAS HITLER?

The biggest improbability of all is that an Austrian tramp, street cleaner and gay prostitute could become the Chancellor of Germany. Hitler joins a long list of obscure blackmail-able figures who have been catapulted to world prominence with the aid of an unseen hand.

Hallett writes that Hitler's grandfather was Nathan Meyer Rothschild. Maria Schickelgruber, Hitler's grandmother, was a maid in the Rothschild's Vienna mansion when his father, Alois was conceived "in fear" in a satanic ritual rape. The Rothschilds could only marry within their extended family so they had illegitimate children who functioned as anonymous agents.

(Apparently this is a pattern with the Illuminati. Bill Clinton is rumored to be a Rockefeller.)

His grandmother received child support from a Jewish businessman who was probably an intermediary for his grandfather. Bridget Hitler quotes Hitler's sister Paula: "Since [Adolf] started the race laws we have no grandfather, Adolf and I. Certainly anyone who wished could make a good deal out of that." (Memoirs, p. 175)

Rothschild's son, Alois Hitler's third marriage was to his niece, Klara, who became Hitler's mother. His father was abusive and his mother over- compensated. Hitler became destitute at age 18 when his mother died, and he lived in a Vienna men's hostel that was a homosexual haunt.

According to Lothar Machtan's "The Hidden Hitler"(2001), there is no question Hitler was a homosexual with a long police record for harassing men in both in Munich and Vienna. These records reached both Russia and England but were never used for propaganda, more evidence that the war may have been a charade. (Machtan also says Hitler tried to join the Communist Party after the war but was rejected for demanding too much, evidence he may have been a "gun for hire.")

In 1912, Hitler traveled to England for training as an Illuminati agent which took place in German. This "training" ranged from imbibing a sense of his role in Germany's destiny to learning how to mesmerize audiences.

It also included trauma brainwashing. The "alter's" consciousness is shattered by witnessing savage atrocities and suffering sexual abuse, all of which is filmed. Then the various fragments of consciousness are programmed and can be accessed with special code words. (Read Fritz Springmeier and Cisco Wheeler for a detailed description of Illuminati mind control techniques. )

Hitler returned to Germany in May 1913 and enlisted in the German army. During World War One, he served as a runner and was captured twice by the English. On both occasions, he was spared execution by an "angel" in British intelligence.

According to Hallett, Hitler enjoyed having women defecate on him. He also had undersized genitals and only one testicle. (Many women whom he courted committed suicide. The love of his life was his 17-year-old half-niece Geli whom he murdered in 1931 when she got pregnant by his chauffeur. Machtan argues that Hitlers real affections were for the chauffeur.)

History is unfolding according to the Illuminati's long-term plan. Wars are plotted decades in advance and orchestrated to achieve the destruction of nations and natural elites, depopulation, demoralization, and of course power and profit.

The super rich have organized themselves into a satanic cult to prey on mankind and to establish their permanent hegemony. Put yourself in the central bankers' shoes. The nations of the world owe you trillions based on money you printed for the cost of paper and ink. The only way to protect this "investment" is to establish a thinly disguised dictatorship, using sophisticated methods of social and mind control. This is the true meaning of the "War on Terror." It's not directed at "Muslim terrorists." It's directed at you and me.

According to Hallett, Joseph Stalin was another Illuminati "agent of war" who attended the Tavistock Psyche Ops training school in 1907. Clifford Shack has suggested that Stalin was also an illegitimate offspring of a Rothschild.

Hallett says Hitler's death was faked (a double was killed) and Hitler escaped to Barcelona where he lived until 1950, when he died of stomach cancer.

Greg Hallett is a maverick and his rambling book is full of repetition and digressions. I wouldn't swear by any of Hallett's claims as yet. But he deserves our thanks for advancing an alternative view of history that while far- fetched is more plausible than what supposedly transpired. We should be able to entertain speculative views without feeling compelled to accept or reject them.

World War Two achieved all of the Illuminati's goals. Germany and Japan were turned into a wasteland. Sixty million people were slaughtered. The Jewish holocaust motivated Jews to establish the Rothschild's world government headquarters in Israel. Idealists and natural leaders on both sides were slaughtered. Nations were laden with debt. The United Nations rose like a phoenix from the ashes. Hiroshima cast a pall of terror over the world. The USSR was a superpower and controlled Eastern Europe. The stage was set for the next act...the Cold War.

Given the bleak outlook for humanity, there is a tendency to actually idealize Hitler as an opponent of central banker hegemony. Hallett's book is an important reminder that like Stalin and Mao, Hitler was an agent; and the Illuminati sponsor "enemies" in order to foment conflict, and keep humanity in its thrall.

Appears to only be the instrument of higher powers: is not a dumb but a very skillful demagogue. Seems to be backed up by Ludendorf. Organizes Sturmtruppen fascist style Attempt of a Coup d' Etat in November the 23rd: Convicted to 5 years of fortress with a possible suspension after 6 months of detention.

I think there was a man who was a double or 'doppleganger' of the fellow who made the speeches and is in all that official footage of the Hitler persona.
What an enigma that character is - Hitler. I've always wondered, what's the fascination so many people have had for this one entity. There is a sense that whomever he was seems out of proportion to a more subtle sense that this was someone vacant. Something like our impression of an actor in some blockbuster film in which the cinematography and budget created a character the actual actor could never even begin to live up to in candid interviews.

A lot of people who actually met Hitler in his heyday have later remarked all along how incongruous their impression was meeting him face to face. I remember Orson Welles told Dick Cavette he was a few yards away from Hitler at the 36 Olympics, and described his surpise that "he had no presence at all. It was as if there was nobody there. I wasn't impressed".

Leni Reifenstall, who is now considered one of the most important cinemagraphic directors of the genre of propaganda film who's techniques are still standard (as in the DNC's Obama apotheosis at the Democrat Convention in 2008), remarked essentially the same impression as Welles. Nobody home. She said she had fully expected to be overwhelmed by Hitler's presence. (She wasn't impressed by Goebbels either, but these were the guys with deep pockets checkbook at that time). Other notable female celebrities of the period consistantly remark the same thing. No attraction. They seemed to also feel intuitively something was 'off' with that, but they don't detail it. I mean, here you have who was considered the most dynamic male figure since Julius Caesar or Alexander the Great, whom the most dynamic and beautiful women in Germany were dying to meet, expecting to get weak in the knees in his presence, feeling the shock and let down meeting what they don't exactly know how to say, but from their impression entirely lacked charisma enough to make an impression upon them at all.

Another thing about this French document - Hitler was born in 1889, not 1880.

Hitler was most definitely an agent with a defined role. He became aware of it in May 1940 when he was ordered to stand down for 2 days rather than take out the British Army at Dunkirk.

His role was to falsely fill the role of 3rd Reich and the 3rd Beast "Leopard" of Dan 7:6. He never achieved "Dominion" so he was obviously a shill ordered to end his reign on Beltane 1945 just exactly as Albert Pike said would happen in 1871. The real "Leopard" is in the White House now and his "Dominion" is certain. It's that "Little Horn" that I worry about coming right after him.


The cited French document states that this 'Hitler' was born in 1880 in 'Passen,' which would have made him 44 at the time of the photograph. All credible sources state that the real Hitler was born in 1889 in Braunau, Austria. Note that the document doesn't state in what country 'Passen' is found--very strange for a 'french' document. And why isn't this government document dated in any place? When was the last time you saw a police document that didn't have a current date on it somewhere?

Notice also that nothing appears after the heading 'domicile' or 'residence'. Why doesn't it state that he was imprisoned and where he was currently imprisoned? Notice also that under 'profession', the document states 'journalist' in a different ink shade. Even the photograph is crudely cropped, and there appears to be a shadow behind it at the top, making it appear to be glue residue from a previous photograph that had been removed.

The idea that this 'important' document just turned up 60 years after the fact should raise red flags for you. Who found this document, and how did it end up being published in a french journal without prior knowledge leaked to the public beforehand? Is the journal 'Science et Avenir' under Zionist control?

If you really think about it, doesn't it serve the satanic Kabbalist-Bankers' interests to put out the theory that Hitler was yet another one of their puppets? Such information would only serve to demoralize anyone who believes that there has ever been a legitimate opposition to their plans of world domination: "All opposition is futile." "We control both sides of the argument at all times." This forged document, it seems to me, only serves to prove those cliches.


9999999999999999999999999999


A word about old politics.................by Mr. Farthon Climbor.



And now, ladies and gentlemen, a word of our dear Lecturer of the Philocosmic Club, Mr. Farthon Climbor.

No MATTER how many long and windy years had passed since 1933- 1945, the people takes positions on Nazi Germany and the Allies (Imperial England, arrogant France and greedy U.S.).

Seems to me a great damage, a great tragedy happened in those years; turmoil and then war; a war who was begined by whom?
By England and France; they did sent an Ultimatum to Nazi Germany to back off from Poland or they would begin a never ending war of destruction on the same country they had defeated two decades before.

For those Allies, the repetition of the war and the possibility of an ultimate victory was exhilarating; they were thinking : Well, this guy Hitler did things good for the german people, improve ecconomy, accelerate science, gives better standard of life for the common worker, but that must to stop, as he is improving too much and too quick- most of all, he is recovering land we take away from Germany in 1920- also he is not paying eternal war reparations we impose at the end of the last war.

Let's help ourselved mantaining the map we ourselves draw after the defeat of Imperial Germany 1920.

Certainly Germany has a great part of territory in Europe that was taken and gived to a country who then was small (Poland) and now it was a big map on Europe, because the Allies gives German territory away from the Germans and gived to Poland (the name means nothing: someone must take the German spoils).
And Mr. Hitler was taking back that theft of the Allies. But the Allies were powerful with the money they extracted year after year of the empoverished "Germany after the World War One = a small piece of land left for them to be living as they could).

Anyone who is not a descendant of a British, French, U.S. soldier, must think about this and say: there is an injustice here, a big one. Nobody should had robbed Germany of its territory, less to impose on Germany tribute in such a quantity no income could made possibly to pay.
France invade Germany when Germany was unable to pay, in the Rhur, where docks and industries are. Nobody raise a finger against France.

All this rigmarole about Jews and the destruction of Nazi Germany seems to me only greedy hands trying to extract money from their investments on Nazi German soil. No matter if the financist were or not Jews; money lending and big ecconomic tycoons have no flags- they are like vultures. They live for the money, and they have power. The joke of Democracy is that a person with enough money could twist laws and do things his way: he just have to search for the right man in the government, and grease the machine.

Nazi German was bad bussiness for England and France. They had to stop it, or they would loose power. They were loosing power since the Nazi government begin.

Before the war, all was about ideas; after the war was begine, it was revenge- for many persons were dying fighting the enemy, and their relatives weren't forgetting it. From a political question, changes to a live or die matter. All because of Mr. Churchill sending ultimatums to Germany, that was only recovering his land pre- WWI.


Hitler begin a big task that was thwarted and lie-upon the minute the war begin, but it is not still donned. That is the worst fear of the British and its allies. One day the idea Hitler had for Germany, will raise for every country in the world- and he will be reinvicated as the great man he was.Jeff Rense New Radio Broadcast WWII And The Theft Of German Intellectual Property
« on: October 26, 2008, 04:38:57 AM » Quote

Time and time again, one encounters the statement in regards to the German Third Reich, that the German Intellectual Elite had left Germany shortly after the establishment of the National Socialist Government in January 1933 and went into exile. But this appears questionable in the face of the undeniable fact that the Allies just before, and especially after the Capitulation of the German Wehrmacht (Army) in May 1945 abducted thousands of German scientists, skilled tradesmen and intellectuals. And tens of thousands of inventions, discoveries, trades symbols, patents, research findings and other intellectual property was stolen and in the light of this, one wonders if the above statement has any basis and reality of the true situation.

In 1945, immediately behind the Allied fighting troops the task force of Anglo/American units called CIOS followed hard at heel. These were under the command of the American officer Ted Beets and the British officer of supplies R.F. Sinsteed. These units had been given the task to view the intellectual property of the German Reich and to appropriate it if needed. Apart from this, the CIOS task force had orders to prevent the German Intellectuals from fleeing abroad. (1)

These CIOS task forces constituted 10,000 technicians and scientists, which were formed into 3,000 units and who forced their way into 33,000 German factories, laboratories, libraries and offices, confiscated documents, samples of materials, trade symbols, patent documentations and engines. They also interrogated top scientist and abducted the same (2).

In the Reich's patent office alone 186,000 files were stolen (3).

Basically everything was confiscated, stolen and plundered in all areas and endeavours that Germans had researched, developed and worked on, by the Allies, on fundamental principle - everywhere. The British "News Chronicles" gave the first review on 21 February 1946. Under the Title "Germany had to disclose its military riches" many of the German intellectual treasures looted by the British were listed here, whereby it is striking, that these riches were far less of a military nature than in the realm of medicine, technical developments and natural science.

Among these listed looted items were Eg. inventions and information for the production of synthetic fuel, synthetic rubber, synthetic lubrication oils, for synthetic fiber- and textile production, diesel motors, optical inventions, heavy printing presses, wind channels, in which speeds of up to 8.000 km/hr were achieved, infra red target instruments, cassette players, electric condensation machinery, durable fruit juices, machines for wrapping chocolates, sugar made from wood, synthetic sapphires for watches, synthetic glimmer, non-running durable stockings for ladies, machines for the production of butter, which produced 1,500 pounds of butter per hour, quartz watches, cellulose products, a multitude of pharmaceutical products, insecticides, cyanides for rust protection and as a substitute for zinc chrome, artificial leather, plastics, colour photography, sewing needles, an innumerable profusion of precision instruments, protective remedies for frost and thousands of other inventions in the area of chemistry, physics, technology and electronics, in which the Germans were streaks ahead of others nations, that is, by five, ten or more years advanced in development.

It was an almost unbelievable, fascinating magical world, that opened up to the Allied task force in these interrogations and conversations with the German intellectuals. The Germans spoke of travel into space, about inter-continental ballistic Rockets, artificial satellites, and other no less fantastical plans, such as the establishment of an "island in space", which would be fitted out with a gigantic mirror to catch the sun rays and beam them back to earth in bundled rays. (4)

But especially in the sphere of weapons- and rocket technology, the German Reich was unbelievably advanced in comparison to their allied enemies. Remote control for rockets and torpedoes, Infrared rays, Ultra sound, all methods of Jet-propulsion, Helicopters and rockets were known to them. The Germans had developed airplanes, March flying craft and the so-called flying disks, which reached speeds that were generally thought impossible, top speeds of an unbelievable 8,000 km/ hour were reached. Even in the most unlikely fields, which nowadays not only draw enthusiasts from the sphere of homeopathy and esoteric knowledge, the Germany of National Socialism was far advanced in regards to that kind of research.

In connection with this there are for instance examinations, done by the Kaiser-Wilhelm Institute for Biophysics in Frankfurt/Main: "These concerned the relationship that electronically charged air has on health. Positive charged air is seen as dangerous to human health, because it causes discomfort and depressions, as for example caused by falling air pressure. Some people, so [it] was found, reacted to positive charged air with Asthma, Hayfever and nervousness. Blood pressure rose to the danger point. I caused all the symptoms of sicknesses known to mountain climbers: laboured and rapid breathing, dizziness, fatigue, insomnia and the like.

Negative charged air achieved the opposite. It had a cheering effect, gave a sense of mental freedom and well being. Emotional depressions could be removed in this manner. In pathological cases it was calming the breathing, and achieved the extinguishing of Allergies and Asthma. The importance of negative charged air comes into play, wherever human beings live and work or seek to recover from illness. The creation of these air ambiances will represent one day our main occupation." (5) The Germans achieved nothing other than to imbue the very air we breathe with added supplements, to manipulate in the person calmness, fear, irritation or cheerfulness, joy or depression according to requirement. (6)

In April 1945 soldiers of the 1st US Infantry division found in Volkenröde near Braunschweig at the air travel Research Institute Herman Göring, the most modern institute of its kind in the world . The Americans were dumb-founded:

"Alone the amount and excellent quality of the instruments, tools and testing equipment was overwhelming. In the aero dynamic Section were wind channels for low speeds, for under sonic, supersonic and the trans sonic divisions. The division for jet propulsion was equipped with a camera, which was able to take a thousand pictures per second, to determine how a flame builds up. In the low pressure chamber it was possible to create conditions as exist at a height of 15 km. In the weapons division were two shooting tunnels, to test the effects on flying rockets if subjected to side winds of up to eight hundred km/ hour ."(7)

These and innumerable other overwhelming evidences of the superiority of German research were gathered up to be taken over by the Americans and who were thus in the position to save inestimable money and untold man hours in research. What the Americans left over was plundered by the English in 1946, dismantled and carted off to Britain. In this way the island was able to establish four ultra modern centres for aeronautic research in Farnborough, Bedford and Fort Halstead.

An inconspicuous witness was the American journalist C. Lester Walkers, who, half year after the sensational list published in Britain, wrote an exhaustive report for the American monthly magazine: "Harpers's Bazaar" under the title "Secrets by the Thousands", in which he listed further details. In his article he describes the manifold work and duties of a special American task force in search of German patents and manufacturing secrets. These commando units found and appropriated no less than 150,000 tones of secret files, which were transported to the USA to be evaluated. A new dictionary with 40,000 special scientific words had to be worked out. The greatest part of these files had nothing whatsoever to do weapons and war efforts. (All quotes in italics in the following article are from Walkers' writing)

The production of Nylon stockings goes back to the synthesis of the Polyamid-fibres of the US company DuPont in the year 1932. The production and machines for the manufacture of cheaper manufacture are an invention of the Germans.

The Germans, commonly labelled as "The Nazis", had discovered one coloured artificial fibres with the characteristics of wool, artificial glimmer, high achieving butter churners and bread baking machines, artificial blood plasma and record turntables, to turn ten records automatically. The Infrared night vision equipment which was discovered with a sense of wonder, was immediately utilised against the Japanese, as well the method of cooling, which resuscitated those who were otherwise doomed to death.

They discovered rolls of plastic-like materials (tape for megaphones), which had an emulsion of Iron-oxide on one side, and on which could be filed the radio programs of an entire day - without gramophone needle and irritating external noises. At IG Farben they found 50,000 recipes for colours, which had been unattainable hitherto by the Americans. Another novelty was yeast, which could be produced in unlimited amounts and able to endure higher temperatures and which contained more protein and calories than beef.

There were revolutionary machines for the production of needles and of lady's stockings which would not ladder. In the whole world existed no method as the German one to mass produce cheese. They discovered the smallest and virtually indestructible condensation apparatus, as well the method of pasteurising milk, which had been tried in vain by the Americans.

Here we need to mention too the sensational German invention of the Infra red equipment, with the help of which it was made possible to see at night. German cars were able to drive at any speed even in total darkness and could make out objects at about a distance of two hundred meters as clearly as in daytime.

Tanks with this equipment were able to see signs at a distance of two miles. A German rifleman was able to use the Infra red long distance target range to shoot an enemy in total darkness. ( The Americans utilised this plundered secret for the first time in Okinawa (April- June 1945) with amazing success.

But as well in the sphere of medicine the Germans had entered into revolutionary realms. For instance had Germans found a way of producing synthetic blood plasma. This was called "Capain" and the end result was equal to natural plasma. An other discovery was "Periston", a substitute for the thinning of blood. Another product of oxidisation of Adrenalin "adrenichtome" was produced by the Germans (called Nazis) in great quantities for combatting high blood pressure. "In the USA annually 700,000 die from this condition, so the population can be served with this discovery" as Walker proudly announced.

Of course at first there were rumours that "Nazi Scientists" had frozen trial persons to death, in order to resuscitate them afterwards. Finally, the American/Jewish Alpine Expert (Michael Bar-Zonat) found four "Nazi physicians" in a laboratory of the institute of aeronautic medicine on the Estate Hirschau in Bavaria. An American Medicine-Corps-Major, Leo Alexander, interrogated these physicians in June 1945, to establish, if experiments were conducted with human victims.

The true circumstances remained unresolved, especially since all laboratory equipment for small animals was carefully preserved, yet all equipment for larger animals was destroyed. Reports and files in regards to human experiments were nowhere to be found. But just then the allied Radio brought a terrible announcement about the concentration camp Dachau, where examinations were conducted on prisoners who had been in these freezing experiments. The wireless named the SS physician Dr. Siegmund Rascher as there responsible officer. Alexander travelled to the 7th American Army, who was in charge of the area in question and who had the reputation of having confiscated an amount of secret documents from the offices of the German protection units (Schutzstaffel).

And indeed , Alexander found a complete final report personally addressed to the SS Reichs leader Heinrich Himmler. In this, there is reported of seven individuals, who were dipped naked into ice water, until they lost consciousness. In this time they were continually monitored and readings recorded. Eg, the reactions of the skin, the inner temperature of the stomach, the pulse, blood sugar readings, reactions of blood corpuscles, bone marrow viscosity etc. In about 53 to 106 minutes the trial persons had died. The allies saw it as an admission of murder on seven persons. Yet this declaration is erroneous, since the German scientists succeeded to revive these clinically dead persons (total ceasing of heart function and breathing), by immediate dipping into hot water (122 degree Fahrenheit/ 50 degree Celsius). (In every one of the dread cases of this experiment the subjects were successfully revived, both temporarily and permanently, by immediate application of water.)

Even this, for the army important research resul,t was immediately transferred to the troops still fighting against Japan, to save fliers who could still be saved after lethal freezing experiences after being shot down. Exactly these cold exposure experiments saved Americans years of experimentation and research, according to a military surgeon of the American Army. The Germans technique for treatment after prolonged and usually fatal exposure to cold was regarded as revolutionary.

Nowadays this method of treatment after cold exposure has been adopted by all American air- and sea rescue services and is generally recognised by modern science branches. (9)

To add further to these explanations is only to say that it was no secret that there have been experiments done with humans. But in regards to these it is to necessary to stress that for these experiments were chosen volunteers. In the case of inmates of concentration camps these were informed of the risks involved before the examinations and experiments. They were lured with better prison conditions, shorter sentences or even immediate release from prison. The experiments with cold exposure have had trial runs with small animals before they were tried on humans. If is really came to cases of death has never been scientifically proved to date.

Also in the area of the textile branch had the search for German scientific and industrial secrets revealed hitherto unknown facts. For instance had the process of the German company of Rayon-knitting machines been able to save space and yet increase the production by 150%. Their left-by-left method in woven products resulted in non-laddering, durable Lady's stockings. A new German- developed machine for the manufacture of needles, would, according to Walker, revolutionise business in the USA as well as in the UK. In this case the skin or fibre had to be manipulated, and with the addition of the enzyme aspergil paracitius not only resulted in better wool but also in a 10% higher yield.

In the branch of food production, medicine and military technology were the secrets thus discovered no less impressive. One of the secrets of the food and nutrition industry was to sterilise fruit juices without the use of heat. The pasteurising process of milk by means of ultra violet rays always resulted in failure in other countries, yet the Germans found by way of extending the range of vision tubes considerably it was possible while at the same time enriching the milk with vitamin D. In a factory in Kiel British researchers of "the joint intelligence committee" found that cheeses of the "Holländer" and "Tilsit" kind were being produced by a new method at an unbelievable speed.

The cheese industry worldwide was not capable of anything coming remotely close. A dairy near Hamburg produced butter of a kind and quality highly prized by Americans, by means of a un-interrupted churning butter machine, the invention by the dairy machine factory in Stuttgart. This machine required less space than American machine and produced 1500 pounds of butter per hour. The machine was promptly shipped to the USA. Another novelty was to produce yeast in un-limited amounts, which besides that, was capable to be used at considerably higher temperatures and had double the amount of protein and several times higher than beef. Also the Germans had developed a method of preserving food by certain freezing techniques or conserve bread by means of a covering emulsion to lengthen its life to about eight months.

Of greatest importance for the future were "the Nazi secrets" in the sphere of aeronautics and of the different types of remote-control projectiles. The V2-rocket, which bombarded London, as commented on by an army-air force publication was a mere toy in comparison to what was envisaged by the Germans. When the war ended, the Americans knew that the Germans (the Nazis!) had 138 types of remote-controlled projectiles and -ignitions using: "Radio waves, radar systems, continual waves, Infrared, ultra sound, light trees and magnetism, just to mention a few."

For the propulsion were used all methods of jet drive, as also for lower, as well as supersonic speeds. Jet propulsion was even used for helicopters. The fuel used was lead to the fuel chambers in the points of the rotor blades and ignited, which caused them to rotate like the knives of a lawnmower. The German A4 Rocket, which was just then taken into production in great numbers, when the war ended, was 64 feet long, weighed more than 24,000 pounds and flew up to 230 miles distance. It rose about 100 miles above the earth and had a top speed of 3735 miles per hour, which is three times as fast as the rotation of the Earth, as it rotates around its own axle at the Equator. The secret of its top speed was the rocket motor, that burnt a mixture of liquid oxygen and alcohol.

This rocket was either radio controlled or self-guided by gyroscopic means to its target. Since the rocket was several times faster than sound, it could not be heard before it hit.

Another German rocket, which was still being developed, received the demarcation "A9". This rocket was bigger still, 29,000 pounds, and had wide wingspans, which enabled it to fly a distance of 3000 miles. It was produced in the famous Peenemünde army-trial station and achieved the unbelievable speed of 5670 miles per hour (about 8000 km/hr).

One long distance bomber, which, as the documents proclaim, had not yet been able to be produced, because the war had finished too soon, would have been capable of reaching New York from Germany within 40 minutes. Guided by just one pilot in an high pressure cabin it reached a height of about 154 miles. It was catapulted at 500 miles per hour, in order to reach its height in just 4 minutes. From there it would be gliding through the outer atmosphere, using up its fuel and then push down its target. With a hundred bombers of this kind the Germans estimated to be able to destroy every city on Earth in military actions lasting only a few days.

The Germans had also put inventions in place, which concerned themselves with the pilots, who would have to leave the plane at super speeds. Normally the head would be severed and the parachute would be riddled with holes upon opening. In order to prevent these unhappy events, an apparatus was invented, which would catapult the pilot instantly outside. The parachute was already full of holes, which was formed from bands, in criss-cross fashion, which slowed his fall until the decreasing pressure automatically freed the normal parachute.

A Nazi variation to radio piloted projectiles was the underwater torpedo, which would unerringly pursue its target, attracted by the noise of the propeller of the ship under attack. It functioned at about 40 miles per hour and left no vapor trail. As soon as it was underneath the target the explosion followed.

In the light of these fabulous inventions of the German Reich and the production of such futuristic weapons, the oft repeated slogans to urge the people to continue their war efforts by the ministry of propaganda of the German Reich appeared therefore quite feasible and by no means only nonsensical talk. In fact, had the war lasted just a few months longer or had the invasion been postponed by only half a year the war could have been won by Berlin. Some of these weapons were only in the trial stages or in the beginning of production and could have been ready for use, given more time. Alone the effect of radio directed weapons with their great accuracy would have created some horror. But not only these remote controlled projectiles, but also the jet aircrafts would have destroyed the allied bombing units, because the radio controlled torpedoes would have eliminated the enemy troop transports and warships.

According to the American clergy man Ludwig A. Fritsch the Americans stole from the Germans, those "giants of science, who had discovered the Tuberculosis-, Typhoid- and Diphtheria- Bacillus, as well as its antidotes, to free mankind from these plagues, who were able to split the atom and who found the x-rays, who were able to make fat from coal and who constructed the finest instruments on Earth," (10) Patents by the hundreds of tons, thefts whose value is not to be estimated, well into the billions in those days, which in our days would be worth well into the trillions of dollars, or, as the "Westfälische Nachrichten" newspaper so soberly exclaimed in January 1947 in these words: "With the removal of its patents and inventions, the German people have in fact paid reparations of such an extent, as no other nation in history has ever done before. These facts are being more or less conveniently overlooked abroad." And to this may be added, by post-war Germany as well!

The total quantity and value of patents stolen by the Allies can only be a rough estimate. The US-American professor for history (California and Düsseldorf), John Gimel, draws our attention to examples, in which the intellectual labour of a single German scientist or technician alone brought profits of X-million Dollars to the American companies(11). According to the disclosures of this historian the Allied forces stole German intellectual property and patents valued in the vivinity of 4,8 Billion to 12 Billion dollars.

According to the protocol of the Conference of representatives of companies and experts on 16. June 1948 in Königsstein the total value of the stolen drawings, patents and trademarks fluctuates between 12 to 30 Billion DM (Mark), of which the last figure seems most likely the more accurate. In the way of German intellectual property the "victors" confiscated about 346,000 German patents as war plunder, of which were 200,000 German patents, registered in foreign countries. Furthermore to be included in the count, there were 20,870 German trademarks and as many as 50,000 new colour shades, that had been developed in the IG Farben research centres. All in all the confiscations meant a loss for Germany of about 30 Billion DM according to Herbert Grabert. (As of 1952) (13).

For the necessary estimation of the value for the total quantity of the stolen patents alone, there exists, not surprisingly, no final and checkable number anywhere, not even in government departments where they could be expected to be held. So for instance, could the DIHT (Deutsche Industrie und Handelstag) only confess, that "unfortunately such knowledge is not available" (14)

And the DPMA (Deutsches Patent und Markenamt) found "it not possible to quantify the value of reparations incurred, due to the time-honoured confiscation by way of protective rights of German patents" (15) , while the Austrian Patent Office declares, that "examinations in regards to the mentioned stolen patents are entirely unknown." (16)

According to what guidelines could the losses and damages to the German Reich and the German nation be evaluated? The value of the stolen patents and products and the time spent and the costs necessary for the development of the products have to be added. The loss of profit for the German economy has to be worked out. Just in case such a cost-evaluation is at all possible- for at the end of the Nineteen Forties and the beginning of the Fifties such an endeavour on part of the West German Industry and Handelskammer (chamber of commerce) failed, for reasons of un-equal back-wash of companies, who feared taxation consequences if they gave the true values of their losses (17), even if this approximate valuation would be an estimation of astronomical proportions.

For C. Lester Walker the unbelievable multitude of volume appears as follows: "In 1945, the greatest theft of intellectual material took place. The discovered and stolen scientific, industrial and military secrets of National Socialist Germany were, Walker quotes with view of Washington, the greatest of this kind of robbery in the world, the first common and total exploitation of the intellectual material of an entire nation". In fact, it represents the greatest haul of intellectual property in human history.

Footnotes:

1 For details view Claus Nordbruch's book: ""Der deutsche Aderlaß. Wiedergutmachung an Deutschland und Entschädigung für Deutschland", Tübingen 2003, p 329 ff

2 Hans Dollinger (Hg) "Deutschland unter Besatzungsnächten 1945 1949, Seine Geschichte in Texten, Bildern und Dokumenten 1945-1949. München 1967 P. 282.

3 Compare Thomas STAMM ''"Zwischen Staat und Selbstverwaltung. Die deutsche Forschung in Wiederaufbau 1945 - 165" , Cologne 1981. p. 45

4 Michael Bar-Zohar, "Die Jagd auf die deutschen Wissenschaftler 1944 - 1960", Berlin 1966, page 48.

5C.Lester Walker, "translated edition, from Hans Werner Woltersdorf, "Die größte Geistbeute der Weltgeschichte", typed Manuscript o.O.u.o. J., S. 6

6 Michael Bar-Zohar, aaO. /(add. 4) P 152

7 Tom Bower, "Verschwörung Paperclip, NS-Wissenschaftler" München 1988, P 111f.

8 "German cars could drive at any speed in total blackout, seeing objects clear as day two hundred meters a head. Tanks with this device could spot targets two miles away. As sniper's cockpit enabled German riflemen to pick off a man on total blackness".

9 C. Lester Walker, "Secrets by the thousands", in Harper's Magazune, October 1946, p. 329ff., quoted http://www.histropgraphyproject.com/documents/ 19461000german_secrets.html

10 Ludwig A. Frisch, "Amerikas Verantwortung für die Verbrechung am deutschen Volk", Grabert, Tübingen 1969, P. 63

11 ebeda P. 100 f

12 ebeda P 100 f industrial disarmament 1945 - 1948", New Brunswick, 1946 P. 142

12 Nicholas Balabkins, "Germany under direct control. Economic aspects of industrial disarmament 1945 - 1948", New Brunswick, 1946 S 142

13 Herbert Grabert, "Hochschullehrer klagen as. Vom der Demontage deutscher Wissenschaft", Göttingen 1952, P. 25

14 From the letter by the German Industrie and Handelstag written to the Author on 20. July 2000.

15 Written to the author by the Deutschen Patenten- und Markenamtes, 31 August 2000.

16 Written to the author by the Österreichischen Patentamts von 3. August 2000.

17 Comp. John Gimbel, "Science Technology, and Reparations, Exploitation and Plunder in Postwar Germany", Stanford 1990, 158

*******************************************************************************


Triangle UFO Witness Fears Alien Abduction ......................By Farthom Climbor.

**************************************************************************************

A UFO witness from Brinkhill, Louth says he is worried about being abducted by aliens after repeatedly seeing triangle-shaped aircraft near his home.
Eric Goring, 61, came into the Leader office this week to recount his bizarre experiences after reading our articles on the Louth 'orange lights' UFOs published last month.

He said: "I have been watching these space ships for six weeks now, and saw eight together on September 25 and more again last night. It was really spooky and I can say for sure that any explanation these are just Chinese lanterns is ridiculous."

Recounting his latest sighting, he said: "I was outside on my scooter at around 5am and watched them until about 6am. One came from the front and then others came in from different directions.

"They seemed to be lighting the clouds up as they went along and their lights were bright white. There was no noise and they moved slowly, hovering and then shooting off at speed."

Mr Goring described the objects as triangular in shape and lined with lights. He drew these diagrams to illustrate what he saw, explaining: "I estimate they were around 50 feet across in size and sometimes they shone a large searchlight from the bottom."

He added: "I am seeing these ships so regularly now and I think they are here to study the planet."

Eric revealed he had a close encounter with one of the objects last month: "I saw one come from the direction of the fields and over a tree. I almost walked right under it as it was just hovering in the air about 200 feet above me.

"It wasn't shining its search line down but I didn't want to go too near it as I was worried about radiation." He added: "And I am worried they might beam me up."

Describing the objects as appearing like balls of white light when viewed at a distance in the sky, Eric said: "They sometimes look red too and give off a bright flash – like a camera flash."

When asked where he thought the UFOs came from, Mr Goring was adamant they were not terrestrial aircraft: "They were definitely from space and of alien origin. There were no vapour trails and I could see the edges of the crafts and they were triangular."

Mr Goring said the only other time he had seen a UFO was in 1999 from Alford Road in Brinkhill: "It was a silver ball that appeared to glitter gold; and it moved silently at a speed of around 75mph. But it was nothing in comparison to what I have been seeing recently."

Eric now regularly scans the skies in the early hours of the morning to keep a watch out for the 'space craft': "I am worried about them and feel I have got to go out and keep looking for them now. Somebody has to keep a look out and report these things as we don't know what they are here for.

"They were the greatest thing I had ever seen, and if you ever saw them, you would never forget them."

Mr Goring concluded by saying he wasn't sure why aliens would choose to visit the Louth area: "I have seen them shining their searchlight down over the local fields so maybe they are fascinated with them in some way." He added: "Brinkhill is a red hot spot for these ships at the moment."

ANOTHER UFO.

Chile. (South).
From the national TV last night (03:30 p.m. 11/06/2009)
A man take a film of a 40 minutes long UFO sighting; the object was clearly triangular, and hovered above the ground at high altitude. At the end of the sighting, small objects were expelled from the big one. Then, it was gone.
He had seen it twice, but only this time he has a film recorder.
In the film, a streak of light is seeing, in an irregular course.


****************************************************

Nibiru, the planet X................By Nick Obre.

****************************************************

For years I have puzzled over the many anomalous and often intractable problems presented by Zecharia Sitchin's Nibiru. A planet that behaves like a comet did not seem to me likely to support life forms similar, if not identical, to us. In 1999 I proposed that the only way that sufficient warmth could be generated among the comets would be if such life existed on a planet orbiting a Dark Star that was itself orbiting the Sun.

For various reasons I suggested that the Dark Star was itself Nibiru, passing directly through the planetary solar system during perihelion with its own retinue of planets. This was a bold claim, given the size of the brown dwarf required.

But I now realise that I was wrong, for a number of technical reasons.

I remain absolutely convinced that the Dark Star exists, and that it is a binary 'star' orbiting the Sun that approaches the planetary zone of the Sun every several thousand years. But I now believe that this Dark Star is not itself Nibiru. It is simply Nibiru's own parent 'star'.

The solution I am proposing on this page brings me back towards Zecharia Sitchin's own previous work. I still add the Dark Star system to his paradigm, and I still require life to exist on a planet/moon closely orbiting that brown dwarf which I have written so much about. But neither the Dark Star nor the Homeworld are ever seen from Earth.

Their closest approach is way beyond Pluto, through the so-called Kuiper Gap, in the Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt beyond Neptune. The planet that is seen is Nibiru; the OUTERMOST planet of the Dark Star system. And apart from it being unable to maintain life, Nibiru is essentially how Sitchin describes it; a reddish terrestrial planet that brightens with a cometary aura when moving amongst our Sun's family of familiar planets.

However, Nibiru is also inextricably linked to the Dark Star and, furthermore, DOES NOT APPEAR TO ORBIT THE SUN when viewed from Earth!

This is a remarkably bizarre claim, I know. But it is part of the problem posed by Sitchin's Nibiru. Indeed, it was the primary objection levelled at me by Dr John Murray, the English astronomer who wrote a paper providing indirect evidence of a brown dwarf orbiting the Sun. He looked at the set of constellations that Nibiru passed through at perihelion and stated frankly that the body was simply not orbiting the Sun, therefore Sitchin's theory was wrong. At the time I put this down to possible misinterpretation of ancient texts. Now I realise that this anomaly was actually part of the puzzle...Sitchin's whacky orbit was right all along!

The 3-Body Solution

The solution I am proposing neatly answers a number of other problems. In fact, everything seem to fall in to place beautifully. To help me explain the rather complex issues underlying this solution, I have created some detailed diagrams, the first of which shows how Nibiru is seen to enter the planetary solar system moving backwards through the sky (the so-called 'retrograde motion of Nibiru):



This diagram needs a little explanation. Bottom left is the planetary solar system out as far as Neptune and Pluto. In the centre of the diagram is the binary Dark Star system which moves around the Sun in a large ellipse taking thousands of years. It has reached 'perihelion' in the diagram, being at its closest point to the Sun. Nevertheless, it is still over twice the distance from the Sun as Neptune.

This distance corresponds to the Kuiper Gap, an area in the comet belt beyond Neptune that is clear of bodies. So, the Dark Star is about 70-80 Astronomical Units away from the Sun at perihelion. It is too distant to be seen from Earth.

The Dark Star orbits the Sun in a similar way to the other planets; pro-grade. I now believe that it has always orbited the Sun, having emerged from the Sun's birth cluster as a binary.

This removes the difficulty posed by a 'capture' scenario, which is statistically unlikely, although not impossible. The pro-grade orbit is also in keeping with the discovery of Sedna, which also has a pro-grade orbit. I strongly suspect that there is a relationship between the orbits of Sedna and the Dark Star; probably taking the form of a resonant orbit. Indeed, the movement of a brown dwarf through the Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt at perihelion would explain many the apparent anomalies of the bodies found in its scattered disc. It makes sense of the science.

There are seven planets in the binary Dark Star system according to the myth. I suggest that one of the inner planets is a habitable world similar to Earth. It is warmed by its proximity to the brown dwarf, and is bathed in its very dim, reddish light. The planets orbit the dark star in a pro-grade movement, in keeping with the initial formation of the binary star system 4.6 billion years ago. They also orbit the Dark Star in much less time than it takes for it to transit perihelion around the Sun. Even the outermost planet shown, which is seen cutting through the outer planetary solar system, is moving faster than the Dark Star. The result is that, although the Dark Star and its outermost planet are actually moving pro-grade, from the point of view of an observer on Earth the outermost planet is seen to move retrograde across the sky. This explains a long-standing anomaly.

That outermost planet is Nibiru. It is seen from Earth as a planetary comet. I think it unlikely that it comes as close to us as the inner solar system; it would be perturbed by the Sun's gravity. But it would be visible even beyond Jupiter because of the shedding of some of its volatile surface ices; it would act as a massive comet even at a tremendous distance from the Sun.

Its perihelion distance will vary over different passages as its own orbit around the Dark Star coincides with the perihelion passage of the system as a whole (so my view here is necessarily 'ball-park'). On occasion there will be an exact juxtaposition between its own perihelion and that of the Dark Star, along a line of sight from the Sun. Other times it will be on the other side of the Dark Star during the binary perihelion. So the timing of Nibiru will necessarily vary, as will its sky position and relative brilliance. Perhaps this is why there are so many unknowns about the transitory appearance of this body.

Another important detail is the fact that Nibiru is not seen to swing around the Sun. It seems to come towards the Sun and then quickly recedes without traversing a large portion of the sky. This explains the weird set of constellations moved through (which probably vary between different transits anyway), and also the short period of time that Nibiru can be seen.

Even though the Dark Star may take literally hundreds of years to traverse perihelion, the time that Nibiru is observable from Earth is likely to be short; perhaps a matter of weeks or months. I suppose it's possible that there may even be more than one visible transit during a total binary perihelion. Either way, this scenario opens up a number of new possibilities.

The idea that one of the Dark Star's planets is our 'Planet X' has been suggested to me by a couple of people before, most notably Rajasun. At the time I was mildly sceptical because it seemed unlikely to me that a small brown dwarf would be able to maintain a planetary system at such a distance; I am suggesting here that Nibiru may be orbiting at about 60AU from the Dark Star (and this may vary as well if its own orbit is elliptical around the binary parent). But a recent precedent was discovered in the form of a large planet imaged at a similar distance from a free-floating brown dwarf known to astronomers as '1207'. The Hubble image here shows the planet (in pink) near to the parent 'star' (centre). So it's not difficult to extrapolate a similar situation for our binary Dark Star, with Nibiru as the accompanying planet.

The '12th' Planet

This finding has turned my thinking around. It presents us with the potential for a 3-body solution to the orbital configuration. Also, instead of one Planet X body we now essentially have 3 notables; the Dark Star and two major planets orbiting it (the other 5 appear to be minor bodies). Those two notables are Nibiru at ~60AU distance and the Homeworld much closer to the Dark Star itself. Add these bodies to the 9 known planets to the solar system brings us to 12 planets, which seems closer to the Sumerian 12th Planet scenario than Sitchin himself!



This image shows the solar system according to my binary Dark Star scenario: (from left to right) The Sun, Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, the binary Dark Star, the Homeworld, and Nibiru.

The 'Ferry'

Other aspects of the myth surrounding Nibiru become more understandable with this hypothesis. In their classic book ‘Hamlet’s Mill’, Giorgio de Santillana and Hertha von Dechen explored the mysterious nature of ‘Nibiru’ in 1969, and showed that, at that time, no scholarly theory adequately explained its celestial nature. Not much has changed since then, except Sitchin's books of course. Here's what Santillana and von Dechen had to say about what the name Nibiru actually means:

“The plain meaning of “nibiru” is “ferry, ferryman, ford” – “mikis nibiri” is the toll one has to pay for crossing the river – from eberu “to cross”."

The 'Planet of the Crossing' is thus a ferry of sorts. This has made little sense up until now because the implication is that Nibiru takes travellers onto another place. That place was never defined by Sitchin who insisted that Nibiru was the homeworld of the Anunnaki itself. Yet, with our new insight the meaning behind the name 'ferry' becomes crystal clear.

The transit of the Dark Star around the Sun at perihelion is still a very remote event. At its closest the Dark Star is still twice as far away as Pluto. To rendezvous with the Dark Star would take many years of space travel with the risk of missing an object too remote to observe.

Yet Nibiru acts as an intermediary. It swoops into the planetary Solar System and then returns to the comet clouds. It would provide space travellers with the ideal stepping stone to the Dark Star. It literally acts as a ferry.

There may be other symbolic overtones to this. If the Anunnaki are physical gods, then their Homeworld is mythological Heaven. It is very similar to Earth ('as in Heaven, so on Earth', 'As Above, so Below' etc). The myth of the Ferryman coming to collect the dead to take them to the Underworld could have new meaning in the light of this new hypothesis.

Angle to the Ecliptic

Another vexing issue with Sitchin's model is the fact that Nibiru is said to move through the heavens at a 30 degree angle to the ecliptic, nearly twice that of Pluto. Yet, a sizeable planet moving through the planetary Solar System at such an extreme angle to the plane of the other planets would cause chaos over time to their orbits. This is called the Kozai effect, which has become a huge headache for me in recent years. Again, this new hypothesis allows us to circumvent this problem in that the Dark Star does not actually move through the planetary solar system at all. However, Nibiru, its outlying planet, does, and Sitchin seems reasonably clear about its angle of inclination from the texts he has studied. How do we explain this?



It seems likely that the inner planets of each of the binary stars (the Sun and Dark Star) should be as they were created; relatively flat to the plane of the initial proto-planetary disc. Billions of years of interaction between the peripheries of these estranged systems, however, will have lead to chaos and perturbation among some of their outer planets. In the Sun's case Pluto is clearly perturbed, as are many of the bodies recently discovered beyond it. So it seems likely that Nibiru is similarly affected, along with any of the Dark Star's own retinue of comets in its locale.

This means that Nibiru's visible arc across the sky could very well be seen to transit a relatively steep inclination, reflecting this angle to the ecliptic. Yet, the binary Dark Star may still move along a path more in keeping with the Sun's other planets. The upshot of this is that we can predict little about the Dark Star's location from the reported transit of Nibiru. This has always been my gut-feeling anyway. I tend to think that the Dark Star lies close to the ecliptic, and still favour the area around Sagittarius as its current location (near to aphelion). This is because the actual 'line-of-sight' perihelion is the Duat region, around Sirius and Orion. Sagittarius is opposite this region on the ecliptic.

But this is only my opinion. Others differ. If my hypothesis here is correct then detailed efforts to deduce the whereabouts of the Sun's binary companion and its own system of planets are almost bound to fail. There are simply too many complicating factors at play.

***************************************************************************************************

The End.